Get your reservation for our annual Kentucky Derby seminar now! Details Here
What Churchill Downs says happened vs. what the court actually did
On April 1, 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CDI) dropped a press release heard ’round the backside. They declared a definitive victory over HISA, citing a federal court ruling that the Authority’s purse-weighted fee methodology was “arbitrary and capricious” and therefore unlawful.
That part is true.
CDI Full Press Release:
Louisville, KY., (April 1, 2026) – Churchill Downs Incorporated (Nasdaq: CHDN) (the “Company”, “CDI”, “we”) announced today that the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (“HISA”) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, and therefore its purse-weighted fee methodology and associated efforts to collect fees under this basis are unlawful.
“We are pleased with the Court’s decision in our favor,” said Bill Carstanjen, CEO of CDI. “It’s unfortunate that HISA wasted so much time and resources, forcing us to go to such lengths to prove a very clear point. This is indicative of HISA’s ongoing fiscal mismanagement, which is a distraction from our joint mission of equine health and safety. By finding that HISA continuously exceeded its authority, the Court reiterated why it was necessary to bring this legal action.”
But in this game, what’s said and what’s actually happening are often two different things. If you’re only reading the corporate PR, you’re missing the “trip” this story actually took.
WHAT THE COURT ACTUALLY DID
Let’s look at the charts, not the highlights. Federal Judge Benjamin Beaton did rule that HISA’s prior purse-based fee model—used from 2022 through 2024—was unlawful because the statute explicitly required fees to be based on “racing starts,” not the size of the purses.
But that’s where the headline ends—and where the real story begins.
1. This was a “Neck” Victory, Not a Romp The court issued declaratory relief only. No damages. No penalties. In plain English: The judge agreed the math was wrong, but he didn’t hand out any refunds.
2. It’s a Ruling on a Ghost System HISA already saw the writing on the wall and moved to a starts-only structure for 2026. This ruling attacks a framework that has already been retired.
3. The Past Remains Intact The court did not vacate prior HISA actions tied to that old model. If those actions remain legally “live,” then this “victory” is more about optics than a total systemic reset.
THE TRICKLE-DOWN EFFECT: THE COST OF “WINNING”
While CDI takes a victory lap, the rest of the industry needs to brace for impact. Here is the reality for tracks that don’t have the “All Aces” legal team CDI employs:
- The “Starts-Only” Shell Game: By winning the argument that fees must be based only on starts, CDI successfully lowered its own bill (high purses, fewer starts). But for smaller tracks with low purses and high field sizes—think Emerald Downs or Finger Lakes—this “victory” actually raises their proportional share of the HISA bill.
- The Deep-Pocket Divide: CDI can afford to withhold millions in fees, weather a board hearing, and force a confidential settlement. A smaller track attempting the same would have their simulcast signal pulled in 48 hours.
- The Precedent Trap: This ruling gives ammunition to critics, but it doesn’t provide a “get out of jail free” card. Smaller tracks now face a HISA that is even more incentivized to collect every penny of the new “starts-only” fees to make up for the budget hole CDI just blew in their balance sheet.
CONNECTING THE DOTS
Think back to the “settlement” reached just days ago between CDI and HISA.
- The Dispute: Millions in alleged unpaid fees for 2025.
- The Result: Case dismissed.
- The Terms: Confidential.
Nothing in this ruling changes that. No numbers revealed. No transparency on who actually cut the check or how much was forgiven. That information remains exactly where it always is: Behind closed doors.
THE PAST THE WIRE TAKE
This wasn’t a knockout blow. It was a targeted legal win on a defunct methodology, wrapped inside a broader, secretive dispute. CDI used its massive resources to force a correction that happens to favor their specific business model, while the smaller tracks—the ones without the gaming revenue or the legal war chest—are left to pick up the tab under the new “starts-only” mandate.
Once again, we see the pattern:
- A closed-door settlement.
- A carefully framed corporate narrative.
- Just enough “news” to influence public perception without delivering an ounce of real transparency.
BOTTOM LINE Churchill Downs got their win. No question. But the idea that this fundamentally shifts the balance of power or solves the deep-rooted issues of HISA’s funding?
That’s a stretch. A big one.
In an industry that constantly preaches “Integrity” and “Transparency,” we have to ask: If this is such a massive victory for the sport… why are the most important details still hidden?
POSTSCRIPT: THE “BELOVED COMMISSIONER” ENTERS THE CHAT
While Churchill Downs was busy polishing their press release and playing chess in a Kentucky courtroom, Mike Repole decided to flip the table and start a street fight.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), “Mike from Queens” made one thing very clear: He isn’t waiting for a quiet settlement. Repole isn’t just looking at the math of HISA’s fee structure; he’s looking at the May 22 vote on Lasix. And he’s connecting the dots that the corporate types usually try to hide. To Mike, the CDI victory isn’t just about fees—it’s proof of a pattern of “unlawful and arbitrary behavior.”
His message to HISA and The Jockey Club?
- The Billion-Dollar Threat: Mike is threatening a massive lawsuit if HISA moves to ban Lasix, citing the devastating financial impact on horsemen who represent the backbone (and the stud book) of this industry.
- The Ecosystem Call-Out: He’s naming names, calling out the “same ecosystem, same funding, and same attorneys” that link HISA to the industry’s old-guard power structures.
- The Line in the Sand: While CDI fought over how they were billed, Repole is fighting over how the game is played.
The PTW Take on the Repole Factor: Churchill Downs fought the math; Repole is fighting the mission. If CDI’s win was a tactical “neck victory” behind closed doors, Repole is trying to gate-to-wire the entire Authority in the court of public opinion.
One thing is certain: Between CDI’s legal precedent and Mike’s billion-dollar war chest, the “status quo” is officially under siege. The May 22 vote just became the biggest race of the year—and it’s not even happening on a track.
No words needed:
